<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Siegelman To Be Released on Bond</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/</link>
	<description>Suburban Mom-Employed-Outside-the-Home Gone Bad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:57:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/comment-page-1/#comment-217069</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/#comment-217069</guid>
		<description>mooncat, I&#039;ve said for a long time that I think Siegelman&#039;s conviction came in part because he was tried with Scrushy.  A lot of people were infuriated by Scrushy&#039;s acquittal on the HealthSouth fraud charges, and they were happy to see him go down for anything.

I do understand why the court would consider Scrushy a flight risk, given some of the stunts he pulled while awaiting sentencing.  I don&#039;t understand the &quot;disappointment&quot; from the Alabama Republican Party over Siegelman&#039;s release pending appeal.  Didn&#039;t hear them complaining when Scooter&#039;s sentence was commuted.  I guess &quot;compassionate conservative&quot; really is an oxymoron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mooncat, I&#8217;ve said for a long time that I think Siegelman&#8217;s conviction came in part because he was tried with Scrushy.  A lot of people were infuriated by Scrushy&#8217;s acquittal on the HealthSouth fraud charges, and they were happy to see him go down for anything.</p>
<p>I do understand why the court would consider Scrushy a flight risk, given some of the stunts he pulled while awaiting sentencing.  I don&#8217;t understand the &#8220;disappointment&#8221; from the Alabama Republican Party over Siegelman&#8217;s release pending appeal.  Didn&#8217;t hear them complaining when Scooter&#8217;s sentence was commuted.  I guess &#8220;compassionate conservative&#8221; really is an oxymoron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooncat</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/comment-page-1/#comment-216808</link>
		<dc:creator>mooncat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/#comment-216808</guid>
		<description>We incarcerate entirely too many people in this country.  I&#039;m not advocating letting all the white collar criminals out, but the ones who have &quot;reasonable grounds&quot; for appeal and some hope that the conviction will be overturned, as Siegelman has, should be out on bond.  Scrushy&#039;s larger bank account does make him more of a flight risk, but he also has a lot less political clout than Don Siegelman has right now.  For an instance, the House Judiciary Committee doesn&#039;t want to hear from Richard Scrushy.  Should that matter?  No.  Does it matter?  Probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We incarcerate entirely too many people in this country.  I&#8217;m not advocating letting all the white collar criminals out, but the ones who have &#8220;reasonable grounds&#8221; for appeal and some hope that the conviction will be overturned, as Siegelman has, should be out on bond.  Scrushy&#8217;s larger bank account does make him more of a flight risk, but he also has a lot less political clout than Don Siegelman has right now.  For an instance, the House Judiciary Committee doesn&#8217;t want to hear from Richard Scrushy.  Should that matter?  No.  Does it matter?  Probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geneo</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/comment-page-1/#comment-215955</link>
		<dc:creator>geneo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2008/03/27/siegelman-to-be-released-on-bond/#comment-215955</guid>
		<description>Hiya

Got a post up you  might like to read.

Come and vist any time. 

:)


http://www.leftinalabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1455</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya</p>
<p>Got a post up you  might like to read.</p>
<p>Come and vist any time. </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.leftinalabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1455" rel="nofollow">http://www.leftinalabama.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1455</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
