Bush Dodges Congressional Oversight Again
I guess W postponed the start of his umpteenth vacation so he could sneak in three recess appointments as soon as the Senate left town for its spring break.
WASHINGTON — President Bush on Wednesday appointed as his top regulatory official a conservative academic who has written that markets do a better job of regulating than the government does and that it is more cost-effective for people who are sensitive to pollution to stay indoors on smoggy days than for government to order polluters to clean up their emissions.
As director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the White House Office of Management and Budget, Susan E. Dudley will have an opportunity to change or block all regulations proposed by government agencies.
It’s more cost effective for people who are sensitive to pollution to stay indoors on smoggy days? More cost effective for whom? The people who have to stay in their houses, running their air conditioners (assuming they have them) and running up their power bills? The children who can’t play outside for fear of an asthma attack? The adults in desperate need of exercise who can’t step foot outside without coughing and wheezing? Not to mention the damage that ongoing pollution does to other life on this planet. But I guess none of that is important when contrasted with the need of polluting corporations to maintain their profit margins.
In a flurry of nominations and appointments, Bush also named a researcher at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, as deputy director of the Social Security Administration. Andrew G. Biggs has been an outspoken proponent of converting Social Security benefits into self-directed retirement accounts, which Bush favors but Democrats have stopped cold. Bush nominated Biggs to that post in November, but the process stalled in February when the Senate Finance Committee refused to hold confirmation hearings because of his views on privatization.
And as ambassador to Belgium he installed Sam Fox, a St. Louis businessman and GOP fundraiser who contributed $50,000 to the Swift Boat veterans’ controversial campaign against Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) in the 2004 presidential race. The White House actually withdrew Fox’s nomination to that same job last week in the face of strong opposition from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
With the Senate on its spring break, all three received “recess appointments,” under which they can serve without Senate confirmation until the 110th Congress adjourns in late 2008 or early 2009, almost at the end of the Bush administration. Their nominations might have failed had they gone through the confirmation process.
Good grief. What a brat! Bush pulled this stunt in 2005 when he used a recess appointment to make John Bolton ambassador to the United Nations after he couldn’t even get confirmation from a Republican-controlled Congress (Bolton’s appointment expired when the 109th Congress adjourned).
Of course, other presidents have used the recess appointment power as well, and I’m sure some of them have done it for the same reason as Bush did — to get back at Congress for refusing to bend over. Fortunately, not only is this Congress refusing to bend over and confirm bad nominees, it’s also willing to challenge the President when he abuses his power.
Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said he plans to ask the Government Accountability Office to issue an opinion on whether the recess appointment is legal.
Recess appointments are intended to give the president flexibility if Congress is out for a lengthy period of time, such as the four-week adjournment in summer. But Dodd said the law was not intended to circumvent lawmakers’ approval.
Bush is still acting as if he had any political capital left, but his pockets are empty. As Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter says, if Bush wants to get anything done for the rest of his term, “he has to take his thumb out of the eye of the Congress.” I doubt he’s mature enough to do that.
April 5th, 2007 at 11:44 am
I’d say he ought to take his thumb out of his ass, not Congress’ eye.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:27 pm
You have a point, Anna.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:28 pm
“In a flurry of nominations and appointments, Bush also named a researcher at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington, as deputy director of the Social Security Administration. ”
This is just what we need, another anti-bureaucrat in charge of a bureaucracy.
April 5th, 2007 at 12:35 pm
“This is just what we need, another anti-bureaucrat in charge of a bureaucracy.”
It’s the Bush/neocon MO. Tell everyone government is bad, put incompetent hacks or anti-government types in positions of power, wait for them to screw up, and voila!
April 5th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Didn’t the Democrat congress promise to work harder and longer during their reign? Oh well, I guess after dropping a big turd of a bill for emergency spending coated with timetables and pork they probably thought they had done enough.
April 5th, 2007 at 3:59 pm
The Democratic Congress has been quite busy trying to unravel the corruption of the Bush administration. And that bill they delivered? It took 57 days, as opposed to four months for the do-nothing 2006 Congress — and for some reason, Bush didn’t complain about the pork in the 2006 bill. Gee, I wonder why…
Meanwhile, the Dear Leader cuts brush on the ranch. Maybe he can stay out of trouble for a few days.
April 5th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Yes you are right. The democrats are immune to corruption. I didn’t realize this was a comedy blog.
April 5th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
Never said they were, but Bush’s temper tantrum about the time and the pork is hypocritical at best. We already know he doesn’t work well with others or take guidance readily, and he’s completely pissed off that he no longer has a rubber stamp Congress. Tough.
April 5th, 2007 at 9:52 pm
He’s cutting brush on the ranch?
They allow that idiot to play with sharp objects? No waaaay.
Next thing you’ll tell me is that he’s the “leader of the free world”. Then I’ll be skeered.
April 5th, 2007 at 9:53 pm
Bottom Line doesn’t like our Congress or Democrats……..WAH!
April 6th, 2007 at 11:16 am
I support the brush.
Furthermore, setting a timetable for removing the brush is not going to get the brush cut faster… believe me.
April 6th, 2007 at 11:34 am
Joe, do you think W is using Weapons of Brush Destruction?
April 6th, 2007 at 4:51 pm
Tip of the iceburg, Kathy. Tip of the iceburg.
I’ve been talking to a few people, lately. Be prepared for something BIG to come out within the next couple of weeks. I mean BIG.
April 6th, 2007 at 5:04 pm
ALmod, do tell!
April 6th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
Oh, that I could! It sadly has not yet been confirmed, so I dare not. You’ll just have to wait as I will until the story breaks. Well, if it breaks. Like I said, it hasn’t been confirmed. It’s very much tied to the FOIA, so if Congress doesn’t get its way, we may never know for sure.