<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gee, No One Could Have Seen This Coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/</link>
	<description>Suburban Mom-Employed-Outside-the-Home Gone Bad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:57:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-105645</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/#comment-105645</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elaine, you are just to funny. Don’t ever loose your sense of humor.<br />
<a href="http://zg0oos3u.tripod.com/wallmart.html" rel="nofollow">wallmart</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Lockley</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-80338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Lockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/#comment-80338</guid>
		<description>Why no mention of &#039;bride burning&#039;? maybe if the women weren&#039;t property to be disposed up with no recriminations there would be some respect for human life and the women wouldn&#039;t be seen as a means to an end. It&#039;s not only legal it&#039;s acceptable to murder your wife there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why no mention of &#8216;bride burning&#8217;? maybe if the women weren&#8217;t property to be disposed up with no recriminations there would be some respect for human life and the women wouldn&#8217;t be seen as a means to an end. It&#8217;s not only legal it&#8217;s acceptable to murder your wife there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-79310</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/#comment-79310</guid>
		<description>Good Lord, Del! You paint a horrifying picture. Which is probably not far from reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Lord, Del! You paint a horrifying picture. Which is probably not far from reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-79155</link>
		<dc:creator>Del</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/#comment-79155</guid>
		<description>My first thought on reading this was, time for them to start a war and get rid of some of that surplus. 

I&#039;d read the new adoption restrictions, Jen, and had to chuckle at that last one. I&#039;m sure the no-Prozac restriction rules out 85% of American women, even the ones who manage to stay thin and snag a husband. Is there some prejudice in China against what we see as relatively benign medications such as SSRIs?

I would think if they wanted to keep more orphan girls on ice, as it were, for the parented baby boys, they&#039;d juist restrict foreign adoption altogether, or perhaps limit it to less desirable children. Maybe now those orphanages will become little wifey holding pens, where the girls are taught intensive Chinese home ec. and exotic man-pleasing bedroom maneuvers. It&#039;s like a Margaret Atwood novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought on reading this was, time for them to start a war and get rid of some of that surplus. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d read the new adoption restrictions, Jen, and had to chuckle at that last one. I&#8217;m sure the no-Prozac restriction rules out 85% of American women, even the ones who manage to stay thin and snag a husband. Is there some prejudice in China against what we see as relatively benign medications such as SSRIs?</p>
<p>I would think if they wanted to keep more orphan girls on ice, as it were, for the parented baby boys, they&#8217;d juist restrict foreign adoption altogether, or perhaps limit it to less desirable children. Maybe now those orphanages will become little wifey holding pens, where the girls are taught intensive Chinese home ec. and exotic man-pleasing bedroom maneuvers. It&#8217;s like a Margaret Atwood novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-79150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queervoice.net/kmcmullen/2007/01/12/gee-no-one-could-have-seen-this-coming/#comment-79150</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling (as an adoptee and mother of a child adopted internationally) the new changes in adoption law for China are a result of exactly this. The new restrictions: &lt;i&gt;officials will refuse adoption to people who are obese, single, over 50 years old or on anti-depressant medication. Prospective parents also will be required to have been married for two years and have no more than four children&lt;/i&gt;. 

Maybe this is a way to keep more girls (90% of the children adopted from China are girls, of course) in country - no matter they are in orphanages or foster care their entire life. 

And I agree with your last paragraph 100%. It&#039;s worse than a shame - it&#039;s sickening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling (as an adoptee and mother of a child adopted internationally) the new changes in adoption law for China are a result of exactly this. The new restrictions: <i>officials will refuse adoption to people who are obese, single, over 50 years old or on anti-depressant medication. Prospective parents also will be required to have been married for two years and have no more than four children</i>. </p>
<p>Maybe this is a way to keep more girls (90% of the children adopted from China are girls, of course) in country &#8211; no matter they are in orphanages or foster care their entire life. </p>
<p>And I agree with your last paragraph 100%. It&#8217;s worse than a shame &#8211; it&#8217;s sickening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
