Taking Off the Gloves

Patricia Todd held a press conference today at the base of the statue of Dr. King that stands in Kelly Ingram Park in downtown Birmingham. She’s kept quiet for several weeks now, waiting for the state Democratic Party to do the right thing, address the issues raised in the contest of her election as State Representative for District 54, and remove all doubt that she won fairly. That hasn’t happened.

Today she called on the Alabama Democratic Party to dismiss the election contest.

“I cannot stand by as one person – Dr. Joe Reed – attempts to hold the Alabama Democratic Party hostage just because he doesn’t like the outcome of the race in District 54. Dr. Reed has been closely involved in the racial slander that played such a role in my opponent’s campaign, trying to pit white voters against black. Despite his direct involvement in the Hendricks campaign, he demanded to be placed on the contest committee, and to appoint two other members of the five-person committee. Yesterday in Montgomery, when it became clear that he was not going to control the process, he made sure the hearing would not take place. This is not fair, and I will not stand by as Joe Reed attempts to steal this election from the voters of District 54.

Therefore, I am calling on the Alabama Democratic Party to dismiss the election contest. First of all, I have contended from day one that the contest is without merit, and I stand by that contention. With specific regard to Dr. Reed’s involvement, the media and the public should be aware that Alabama state law requires that the person contesting an election pay the contest fee – in this case, that would be Ms. Childress. But the fee was not paid by Ms. Childress; it was paid by Dr. Reed. This is a clear conflict of interest by a party official, and taints the entire process.”

Sources in the party have told Patricia that there were three checks involved in the attempt to pay the $3,000 contest filing fee. First, a check from Ms. Hendricks’ account bounced, then came a check from Alabama Democratic Conference (Dr. Reed’s organization), and finally the fee was paid with a cashier’s check drawn on RegionsBank.

Kelly Ingram Park is a lovely place, lush and green, with a direct line of sight to Sixteenth Street Baptist Church and the Civil Rights Institute. I thought it was particularly appropriate that Patricia spoke in the shadow of the man who dreamed of a day when we would no longer judge people by their skin color.

Okay, state party officials – it’s your move.

al.com coverage

UPDATE: Here’s the full text of Patricia’s statement:

Statement by Patricia Todd
Representative-elect, Alabama House District 54
August 16, 2006

Thank you for coming today. Iwould like to read a prepared statement, after which I will be happy to answer any questions. Since the voters of House District54 elected me in the runoff on July 18, myopponent in the runoff and her surrogates have done their best to cast aspersions on mycampaign, and to question the legitimacy of the voters’ decision to make me their representative. These efforts have been personally hurtful to me and my supporters, but more importantly, they have been extremely divisive and destructive to the community, attempting to exploit the racial divisions that have held our city and our state back for so many years.

In spite of the hurtful and divisive rhetoric that has been used by my former opponent, and on her behalf, I have remained quiet during the process resulting from the filing of a contest to the election by Ms. Hendricks’ mother-in-law. I have been quiet because it certainly is within Ms.Childress’ rights to challenge the election, and because I believe in democracy and due process. I believed that the DemocraticParty would deal with this issue fairlyand expeditiously, and I did not want to be party to further damaging our community by fighting the contest in the news media, as my former opponent and the powerful interests who support her have attempted to do.

So why am I speaking out today? I’m speaking out because I love the Democratic Party and what it stands for. I believe in the principles of the party, its commitment to stand for the disadvantaged, the underprivileged and those who are underserved by government at all levels. I campaigned in every corner of District 54, asking all of the
district’s voters to give me the opportunity to address issues like alleviating poverty, improving public education, raising the minimum wage, securing funding for mass transit, and providing affordable housing for all citizens.

What I found in my campaign is that voters want someone who will stand up for them, and fight to improve the quality of their lives. They don’t care whether their representative is black, white or brown, as long as that representative gets results. I was privileged to receive the support of more than one of every four black voters in District 54, people who believe in Dr. King’s dream that people be judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. They and everyone who voted for me deserve to have their votes count, and today I begin the fight to make certain that happens.

I cannot stand by as one person — Dr. Joe Reed — attempts to hold the Alabama Democratic Party hostage just because he doesn’t like the outcome of the race in District 54. Dr. Reed has been closely involved in the racial slander that played such a role in my opponent’s campaign, trying to pit white voters against black. Despite his direct involvement in the Hendricks campaign, he demanded to be placed on the contest committee, and to appoint two other members of the five-person committee. Yesterday in Montgomery, when it became clear that he was not going to control the process, he made sure the hearing would not take place. This is not fair, and I will not stand by as Joe Reed attempts to steal this election from the voters of District 54.

Therefore, I am calling on the Alabama Democratic Party to dismiss the election contest. First of all, I have contended from day one that the contest is without merit, and I stand by that contention. With specific regard to Dr. Reed’s involvement, the media and the public should be aware that Alabama state law requires that the person contesting an election pay the contest fee — in this case, that would be Ms. Childress. But the fee was not paid by Ms. Childress; it was paid by Dr. Reed. This is a clear conflict of interest by a party official, and taints the entire process.

I have spent my entire adult life working for civil rights and justice for all people. I have stood by and listened as my former opponent and her supporters — including the Mayor of this city and other elected officials — have painted me as a racist who somehow had the intention of becoming a Republican after the election. Clearly, they neither know nor care about me and my record of community services and my legislative priorities. I am a Democrat, and will be a Democrat as I go about my duties in the legislature.

It is past time that we come together to address the real issues facing our community and our state. Start with the fact that 76 percent of all children in Birmingham Public Schools live in poverty. That is an issue that affects us all — black and white, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican — as we work to improve our community and give hope to those who have been hopeless for too long. In closing, I call again on the Alabama Democratic Party, on my supporters and those of my former opponent, and on all in Birmingham and Alabama who believe it is time to move beyond divisiveness and begin building a better future.

13 Responses to “Taking Off the Gloves”

  1. Wheeler Says:

    “Despite his direct involvement in the Hendricks campaign, he demanded to be placed on the contest committee, and to appoint two other members of the five-person committee.”

    that is the worst part of the whole thing. if he wants to bring charges, fine. but let a neutral decision maker resolve the situation. if todd’s stament is accurate, joe reed’s opposition is to the truth.

  2. The Alablawg » Blog Archive » How Do You Spell Crooked? Says:

    [...] (Update: Kathy has Todd’s entire statement.) Explore posts in the same categories: Elections, Corrupt Politicians, Alabama Legislature [...]

  3. Pam's House Blend Says:

    Reed needs to step aside regarding the committee dealings. If his intentions were actually about determining the truth, he would have no problem stepping away to make sure there was no appearance of influence.

    The Hendricks campaign needs to stop the race-baiting, it diminishes cases where there really is a problem when you toss it out there every time things don’t go your way. It’s sad, embarrassing, and worse, further polarizing.

  4. Dre’s Ramblings Says:

    [...] Reading the latest in the District 54 debacle (courtesy of Birmingham Blues) and following several news stories throughout the city and region right now, I wonder if we will ever truly live in an area where race, religious belief or sexual orientation is not the only or major label that defines you. Race was not the first thing that came to mind when I first visited Birmingham, though it guided my exploration of the city, including trips to the Civil Rights Institute and Sixteenth Street Baptist Church. Race did not enter my mind when I applied for my current job and decided to make the Magic City my home though I was told by many that it should have been. It has become increasingly obvious that race is viewed as the deciding factor in most things here in the nearly two years since my arrival in the Magic City. [...]

  5. 412 Precondition Failed Says:

    [...] [...]

  6. EchoBooming in Birmingham Says:

    Hrm, my trackback failed, but here’s a manual trackback anyway:

    [...]As Birmingham Blues said, the gloves have come off. Patricia Todd held a press conference yesterday to encourage the Alabama Democratic Party to dismiss the contest of the election results (full text of her statement here).

    I tried to quit talking about this subject earlier this week, but a quick glance at some local blogs got my blood boiling again.

    Andre also took his gloves off in his first post this morning, a thing he does not do nearly often enough in my opinion (although I understand why he doesn’t). In the 60’s Black leaders in this city and state quickly brought about drastic changes for the civil rights of minorities for this entire country. It seems that ever since that victory, Black “leaders” have been shooting themselves in the foot. The district 54 “race” is just the latest in a long history of Birmingham area Black “leaders” and politicians attempting to bolster their race’s position in society, politics, power or whatever, but instead end up dividing the community and continuing the long running stagnation of ideas and action in our region.

    I’m ready for cooperation, I’m ready for progress, I’m ready for REAL LEADERS, and I don’t care if they’re white, black, purple, male, female, gay, lesbian, christian, etc.[...]

  7. North Dallas Thirty Says:

    I thought it was particularly appropriate that Patricia spoke in the shadow of the man who dreamed of a day when we would no longer judge people by their skin color.

    Does it really surprise you that a party that thinks racist attacks against candidates they don’t like, even if they’re ALSO black, is doing this?

    The Dems had the chance to stop Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and others from hijacking King’s dream a long time ago. However, arguing that skin color should grant preferential treatment was what allowed them to keep their grip on the black community. Ironic that Patricia, who has argued for preferential treatment based on skin color, is now being bitten by it.

  8. Kathy Says:

    NDT, you do realize Patricia is white? Working for equality does not equal arguing for preferential treatment based on skin color.

  9. North Dallas Thirty Says:

    NDT, you do realize Patricia is white?

    Absolutely I do — that’s part of the irony.

    Working for equality does not equal arguing for preferential treatment based on skin color.

    Affirmative action and preferential awarding of contracts and business to women and minorities is not “equal”.

  10. North Dallas Thirty Says:

    Looking at that, though, I need to clarify something.

    Affirmative action as used in the corporate world — namely, a corporate commitment to increase diversity of the workforce and vendors by proactively seeking out and inviting candidates and companies to bid — is fine.

    Affirmative action as used in the government and education world — where individuals are automatically given preference in selection based on skin color or gender — is not.

  11. Kathy Says:

    NDT, I think you’re making some big assumptions without any information. Or do you think that any time a woman works for equality and civil rights that she’s actually pushing preferences based on gender or race?

  12. North Dallas Thirty Says:

    Um…..you DO realize the irony of your second sentence relative to your first, right?

    But putting that aside, no, I don’t believe that.

    What I do believe, though, is that Democrats like Patricia do. She could have spoken up at any time about black racism, or the unfairness of preferential treatment, or anything of the sort — but it would have lost her the election in a landslide.

  13. Birmingham Blues » Blog Archive » District 54 Hearing Rescheduled - Really Says:

    [...] The contest hearing for District 54 has been rescheduled for Thursday at 2:00 pm.  Despite the fact that all the citizens affected live in Birmingham, the hearing will be in Montgomery (same place as before).  I’m wondering if the later time means the party is hoping for lower turnout — or maybe that’s just too cynical.  I’m also wondering how many committee members are beholden to Joe Reed. [...]

Leave a Reply